High end detail without being sharp and piercing. Mids and vocals was very balanced. Most important, the bass is tight and deep. Jacobee New Head-Fier. Joined Oct 8, Posts 1 Likes 0. If you don't mind me asking, how did you manage to open it up?
I can't see any exposed screws or case seams, but I'm probably missing something. A pair of this "fell into my lap" so to speak, as a friend needed the cable replaced. Joined May 5, Posts Likes Pull gently on the pads they'll come off then a few screws to take out and thats it. Those cans cna be described in 2 words: cheap, fun.
I use them whenever i'm going out and have no clue what might happen to me excessive drinking, club, playing soccer on Shanghai's most touristy street What kind of tape did you use to block the holes? I used 3M Micropore medical tape but I have used masking tape, scotch tape and duct tape before. Basically anything that seals. Joined Jul 1, Posts Likes Thanks for the review.
Saw these at Target and was tempted, though the only color left was lime green. Still may get a pair, though. Joined May 28, Posts 4, Likes If somebody's interested in FR charts:.
After two more days of use for both headphones, I did another comparison. The re-cabled headphone is more balanced than the stock. Better high end detail with better control of sibilance. These headphones are pretty easy to disassemble. They have normal-sized screws that any old Phillips can handle. You can get right down to the headphones' innards to clean out any dust, but unfortunately, you can't take the cups off their metal rails without snapping some plastic.
These headphones don't require batteries, which is great. Batteries are a pain and require additional maintenance. Both sets of headphones had roughly similar frequency responses, which were dynamic to a detrimental degree. Some of the higher mid-tones will be under-emphasized compared to the bass. Neither set was pristine, but neither had levels of distortion that the average listener would care about.
We thought the RP-DHs were very, very tight. Both headphones are similar, to a degree that's very detrimental for the RP-DHs. All you get, though, is slightly better tracking and a less comfortable fit. Neither set of headphones wowed us with their design. We do think the PXC IIs were built to last a bit longer, but they seemed a bit too dainty to inspire too much confidence in their construction. It was dynamic without totally blowing out or dimming large swaths of the frequency range.
This is a budget battle. They do, on the other hand, cost a lot more money. If you're tired of the poor audio quality you'd find on a media player's packaged-in headphones, you'll probably get more for your money with the PXC IIs. The Triqiis look cheap, feel cheap, and are cheap. They'll probably last you longer too. The Triqiis really don't have a bad frequency response, which is fairly amazing considering that 1. Foam padding provides a poor seal with your ear, and allows sound to bleed out.
The RP-HTX7P-RSs have a small amount of distortion in the low end, but really, it's such a low level that only audiophiles will bat their eyelashes audiophiles are notorious for showing off their long, luxurious lashes.
The Triqiis have a ton of distortion in the low end, likely because the foam padding doesn't do much to keep the bass from leaking out. The Triqiis performed slightly better on our tracking test. Even though there was some fluctuation , the volume really didn't shift to an extent that the human ear could hear.
The Triqiis really don't isolate well, which we again blame on their foam padding. Foam padding does everything it can to prevent a good seal with your head, which lets a lot of external noise in to your listening space. The Triqiis weren't particularly comfortable. Products in your basket Amount Price. Special Offer. Shipping costs Product Fiche Related information Shipping costs.
Select color. Quantity Quantity error. Please input 1 to More information. Successfully added to basket. Browse all Headphone. True Wireless Earbuds Firmware Update.
Sort by Featured Latest. What Hi-Fi? The Triqiis weren't particularly comfortable. The foam was a bit scratchy and hot. It's a really close call here, though, so we'd highly recommend trying both sets on before deciding on a purchase. We'd recommend trying out both pairs before you buy, and deciding based on comfort and sound. The DT s feature a much sturdier design and a very classy look.
They look like expensive headphones without being overly garish. As for durability, the DT s win this by a mile. They're really, really sturdy, with a thick metal core to their band. The DT s have a much more even frequency response.
Neither set of headphones are particularly good isolators. The DT s have semi-open backs, so they're really, really not meant to isolate. We thought the DT s were pretty comfortable. They have very soft padding with a plush-like covering. They only potential problem is they might start to feel really heavy after a few hours: the padding in the band is great, but the DT s have some heft to them.
If you want a great sound on a durable set of cans, the DT s are definitely the better choice. Mark Brezinski is a senior writer with over ten years of experience reviewing consumer tech and home appliances.
Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes. We'll help you find the best stuff and love the stuff you own.
Popular Search Terms dishwasher walmart washer review tv cameras mattress air fryer dell sony. Money All Money Credit Cards. Accessibility All Accessibility. Related content. Related content feature These are the best headphones we saw at CES Meet the tester Mark Brezinski Senior Writer markbrezinski. See all of Mark Brezinski's reviews.
0コメント